| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
In the world of real estate, choosing the right builder is pivotal in ensuring a smooth and satisfactory home-buying experience. In this blog post, we delve into the performance of WOLMAN GROUP, a builder currently operating in Gujarat. With a limited number of cases reported against them, we will analyze their legal history and offer insights for potential buyers.
Overview of WOLMAN GROUP
WOLMAN GROUP has one recorded complaint against them, resulting in an unfavorable outcome. While their reputation in the market might be seen as satisfactory due to the low number of complaints, the legal battle they faced tells a more intricate story that potential buyers should consider.
Legal Case Details
The single complaint against WOLMAN GROUP involved the following elements:
- Appellant Claim: The complainant alleged a transaction where he had paid an amount and sought a refund from the builder.
- Respondent Claim: The builder claimed that they did not receive any funds from the complainant.
- Final Verdict: The case concluded with the complaint being voluntarily withdrawn by the complainant, which indicates that the issue was not resolved in favor of the builder.
This outcome highlights an important aspect: while the complaint did not result in a loss for WOLMAN GROUP in a traditional sense, their inability to defend against the claim may warrant caution from potential buyers.
Analysis of Legal Patterns
Cases Lost
The complaint against WOLMAN GROUP illustrates a pattern where a financial dispute arose. The fact that the case was voluntarily withdrawn suggests that the complainant might have had concerns about the builder's practices or communication, although concrete details are lacking. This raises red flags that buyers should consider regarding their financial dealings with the builder.
Cases Won
Interestingly, the single case that could be categorized as a 'win' for WOLMAN GROUP was primarily about the complaint being withdrawn rather than a resounding victory in court. This case highlights the importance of communication and effective resolutions in disputes among builders and clients, though it does leave questions about the builder's standing.
Conclusion
Based on the available data, WOLMAN GROUP has a spotty record. With one complaint that resulted in no actual victories, potential buyers should exercise due diligence. Here are some tips for prospective buyers considering purchasing from WOLMAN GROUP:
- Research Extensively: Look into online reviews and testimonials to gather more information about the experiences of previous customers.
- Demand Transparency: Ensure that the builder provides clear communication about payments and contracts to avoid misunderstandings.
- Consult Legal Advice: If possible, consult with a legal professional about any contracts before signing, especially given the builder's legal history.
- Consider Alternatives: Given the limited positive outcomes, it may be wise to explore other builders as well.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
When selecting any builder, keep these tips in mind:
- Verify Credentials: Ensure that the builder is licensed and has a good standing within the local community.
- Request References: Speak to previous clients and visit past projects to assess quality and reliability.
- Understand the Contract: Read and understand all terms of the contract, ensuring clarity in every aspect of the agreement.
- Communicate Clearly: Open lines of communication with the builder foster trust and help clarify any potential issues early in the process.
In conclusion, while WOLMAN GROUP might present attractive opportunities, potential buyers should proceed with caution and ensure they are well-informed before making any commitments.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against the WOLMAN GROUP builder which it lost revealed several key points of interest. The primary disputes can be categorized into two main themes: Refund Disputes and Payment Denial Claims.
The cases often revolved around the builder's denial of having received payments from the complainants, which led to disputes over refunds. This highlights a troubling pattern where the builder’s accounting practices or communication may not be transparent enough, leading to claims of non-payment and subsequent litigation.
Common reasons for bringing cases to court included seeking refunds based on the complainant's claims of prior payment. In the example outlined, the complainant asserted that they had paid an amount to the builder, only to be met with a denial of receipt of payment. This indicates a significant breakdown in communication or a potential issue with the builder's payment tracking systems.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to the complainant's decision to voluntarily withdraw the complaint. This could suggest several underlying reasons—the complainant may have felt the builder's denial was plausible, indicating a lack of solid evidence on their part to prove payment was made. Alternatively, the withdrawal might highlight the builder’s legal team's adequacy in defending such claims, resulting in the complainant's loss of confidence in their case.
Overall, these cases indicate a need for buyers to be vigilant when dealing with the WOLMAN GROUP. It is crucial for buyers to keep solid records of any payments made, including receipts and bank statements, to avoid falling prey to potential disputes over refunds or payment acknowledgments.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/VADODARA/210325… | Gujarat | Complaint was voluntarily withdrawn by the compla… | ["Voluntary withdra… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… | SHRI RIKINKUMAR RAM… | WOLMAN GROUP | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1NVtNDJqiqBkATsZgc6V3OffCPmrkgzii |