No Logo Available

WORTH INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED

3.8/5 (57 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Madhya Pradesh
CINU45400MP1998PTC012806
Year EstablishedNot Available
Address39/9A,SAKET NAGAR, BHOPAL MP 462024 IN
Company StatusPrivate

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction to Worth Infrastructure Private Limited

When considering a new home or commercial investment, the reputation and track record of the builder are paramount. Worth Infrastructure Private Limited operates primarily in Madhya Pradesh but has been mired in controversy with a significant number of legal disputes. In this blog post, we will explore the builder's history, the legal landscape surrounding their projects, and essential advice for potential buyers.

Overview of Legal Complaints

Worth Infrastructure Private Limited has faced a staggering 57 complaints, with an unfortunate record of losing all these cases. This raises questions about the accountability and performance of the builder, especially in regards to the ‘Eden Gardens’ project, which is at the core of the disputes.

Breakdown of Legal Cases

The cases against Worth Infrastructure Private Limited typically revolve around claims of incomplete projects. Most complaints outline that the 'Eden Gardens' project lacks critical facilities such as:

  • Sewage …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Incomplete Project Claims Delayed Possession Claims Disputes over Proper Facilities Non-Compliance with Authority Directives

Analysis of the cases filed against Worth Infrastructure Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals significant insights into the common disputes associated with their projects. The cases primarily revolve around four key themes: incomplete project claims, delayed possession claims, disputes over proper facilities, and non-compliance with authority directives.

The majority of the cases involve claims that the project 'Eden Gardens' was incomplete, lacking essential facilities such as a sewage treatment plant, community hall, fencing, and proper maintenance of parks. The builder consistently claimed that all work had been completed and proper facilities were provided, yet the authority directed them to finish the remaining work and provide the necessary amenities within a specified timeframe in each case. This pattern suggests a systemic issue where the builder may have been prematurely claiming completion and adequacy of their projects.

Delayed possession claims also emerged, where buyers sought compensation for the builder's failure to …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review

Interested in buying from WORTH INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED?

Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.