| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
In the real estate market, choosing the right developer can significantly impact your home buying experience. Writing & Desai Developers, operating primarily in Gujarat, presents a case study of a builder with a minimal yet noteworthy legal history. This blog post delves into the builder's performance, particularly concerning complaints and legal cases, guiding potential buyers in making informed decisions.
Builder Overview
Name: Writing & Desai DevelopersNumber of Complaints: 1
Cases Won: 0
Cases Lost: 1
States with Projects: Gujarat
As noted, Writing & Desai Developers has faced one legal complaint, a situation not uncommon in the highly regulated real estate sector. While 1 complaint might seem insignificant, examining the details reveals a deeper understanding of the company's handling of such situations.
Legal Case Details
Case Summary:The lone case filed against Writing & Desai Developers involved the appellant claiming that the builder failed to submit quarterly reports for their project 'Paridhi Heights' on time. In defense, the builder argued that the delays were due to the lockdown and asserted that no units had been booked yet. Ultimately, the project registration was canceled by the authority, highlighting a serious breach of the regulatory requirements for timely reporting.
Analysis of Legal Performance
Patterns in Lost Cases
Currently, Writing & Desai Developers has a record of one lost case. The reason for the loss revolves around the failure to furnish required documentation (quarterly reports), which is critical for maintaining transparency and compliance in real estate projects. This indicates a potential pattern where inadequate organizational structures or external challenges (like the pandemic) may impact the builder's operational reliability.
Patterns in Won Cases
Conversely, Writing & Desai Developers has not won any legal cases to date. This record raises concerns, especially for potential buyers who might seek assurance that the builder has successfully navigated legal challenges in the past. A lack of victories in cases suggests a need for improved compliance and proactive project management from the builder.
Conclusion
Based on the provided information, Writing & Desai Developers has a concerning legal record, specifically the loss of a significant case tied to service compliance. For potential buyers:
- Due Diligence: Always conduct thorough research before committing to a purchase, including checking on any legal disputes.
- Documentation: Ensure that the builder is diligent with documentation and reporting requirements. Delays can indicate larger compliance issues.
Tips for Buyers When Selecting Any Builder
- Research the Builder's History: Look into their previous projects and any legal cases.
- Check for Complaints: Use available forums or regulatory bodies to examine any complaints filed against them.
- Evaluate Communication: Ensure that the builder has effective communication practices, particularly concerning project updates and documentation.
- Seek Feedback: Talk to previous clients to gain insights into their experiences and the builder's reliability.
- Get Everything in Writing: Always ensure that agreements and promises are documented to protect your investment.
In summary, while Writing & Desai Developers has a minimal complaint record, the lost case underscores the importance of diligent oversight from both the builder and the buyer. Ensuring compliance with legal standards is essential in the real estate sector, and potential buyers should proceed with caution.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against the builder Writing & Desai Developers, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases primarily revolved around three critical areas: non-compliance with reporting requirements, disputes over project delays, and regulatory non-compliance.
In terms of non-compliance with reporting requirements, the builder faced action for failing to submit quarterly reports for their project 'Paridhi Heights' within the specified timeframe. The builder's defense—that the reports were delayed due to the lockdown and the lack of any booked units—was ultimately insufficient to prevent the cancellation of the project registration. This highlights a pattern where builders may face legal consequences for not adhering to essential regulatory reporting obligations, even in the face of challenging circumstances.
The disputes over project delays often involve the builder attributing delays to external factors rather than acknowledging any potential mismanagement or insufficient planning on their part. In the case of 'Paridhi Heights,' the builder claimed delays were due to the lockdown, which indicates a broader trend of builders disputing delay penalties by pointing to unforeseen events beyond their control.
Regulatory non-compliance emerges as another significant theme, as seen with the authority's decision to cancel the project registration for 'Paridhi Heights.' This action likely reflects a broader commitment to enforcing compliance within the real estate sector, ensuring that builders adhere to legal and regulatory standards to protect the interests of prospective buyers.
The common reasons for the builder's losses in these cases center around insufficient evidence to support their claims, failure to comply with reporting and regulatory requirements, and a lack of accountability for delays. The builder's position might have been strengthened with solid documentation or evidence highlighting their efforts to comply or to mitigate delays; however, the outcomes suggest a lack of such substantiation.
Overall, these case summaries serve as a crucial warning to potential buyers about the importance of diligence when evaluating builders. Buyers should look for builders with a proven track record of compliance, timely reporting, and transparency in their dealings. Understanding these factors can significantly enhance the likelihood of a positive and hassle-free real estate investment.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G/CMP/NCQR/SURAT/20… | Gujarat | The Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority file… | ["Non-submission of… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Gujarat Real Estate… | Writing & Desai Dev… | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1LgFI96Ow676VorKC4aAeOi3f-fhiyVQf |