| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
In the competitive world of real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial for ensuring a smooth purchasing experience and securing your financial investment. This post delves into WyaNen Vastucon LLP, a builder based in Maharashtra, analyzing their legal history and offering insights for potential buyers.
Overview of WyaNen Vastucon LLP
WyaNen Vastucon LLP operates primarily within Maharashtra, managing multiple projects in the region. However, a closer examination of their legal history reveals some concerning trends that potential buyers should consider.
Legal Performance
WyaNen Vastucon LLP has faced a total of 2 complaints, resulting in a 100% loss rate with no cases won. This is a significant indicator when evaluating the reliability and credibility of the builder.
Analysis of Legal Cases
- Cases Won：
- The builder has won a total of 0 cases. This pattern showcases a lack of successful legal outcomes, which could be indicative of the builder's operational effectiveness and adherence to project timelines.
- Cases Lost：
- The builder has lost 2 cases, with the final verdict in both instances being a mere
Delay condoned. No costs.
This suggests that while the cases were acknowledged, the builder faced issues that led to unfavorable outcomes, potentially related to delays in project completion or unmet obligations.
- The builder has lost 2 cases, with the final verdict in both instances being a mere
Patterns Identified
- Common Factors in Lost Cases: The lost cases both suggest an underlying issue with timeliness. The phrase
Delay condoned
indicates that the builder may struggle with adhering to project timelines, which is essential in real estate where buyers invest with expectations for prompt delivery. - Common Factors in Won Cases: Interestingly, there are no won cases to analyze further, pointing to a concerning trend of unsuccessful legal defenses that could deter potential buyers.
Conclusion
Based on the available legal information, WyaNen Vastucon LLP presents a pattern of legal challenges that would warrant caution from potential buyers. The absence of won cases and the losses recorded raise questions about the builder's reliability and commitment to fulfilling contractual obligations.
Tips for Potential Buyers Considering WyaNen Vastucon LLP
- Review Legal Records: Always conduct thorough research on any builder’s legal track record. Understanding previous complaints can provide insight into potential risks.
- Request Transparency: Engage with the builder and request clarity on project timelines and past performance to gauge their accountability.
- Seek References: Talk to past clients if possible. Testimonials and experiences from other buyers can illuminate the builder's reliability beyond legalities.
General Tips for Buyers When Selecting Any Builder
- Investigate Reputation: Look for online reviews, ratings, and forums discussing the builder's performance.
- Check Credentials: Ensure that the builder is licensed and registered with appropriate authorities.
- Visit Completed Projects: If feasible, visit other projects completed by the builder to assess quality and workmanship.
- Understand the Contract: Take time to review contracts in detail, preferably with legal assistance to avoid ambiguity.
In summary, while WyaNen Vastucon LLP may have projects in Maharashtra, their legal challenges suggest a need for careful consideration and thorough investigation by potential buyers.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against WyaNen Vastucon LLP, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into three main topics: Delayed Possession Claims, Project Delay Disputes, and Regulatory Compliance Issues.
The first type of cases involves delays in delivering possession to buyers, leading to claims of inadequate fulfillment of contractual obligations. Buyers often contest delays attributed to the builder, citing reasons like mismanagement or insufficient resources. In the summaries provided, the builder faced two cases where the final verdict was 'Delay condoned. No costs,' indicating a pattern where buyers sought to highlight the builder's failure to meet timelines.
Project Delay Disputes revolve around the builder's attempts to justify delays by attributing them to other parties involved in the project or to unforeseen circumstances. Common reasons for bringing cases to court include disputing the builder's assessment of delay causes and seeking to impose penalties for delays that buyers believe are within the builder's control.
The third theme, Regulatory Compliance Issues, encompasses cases where the builder faced challenges related to adherence to municipal orders or other regulatory requirements. Although the specifics of the claims were not provided in the summaries, this theme is critical as it suggests that buyers may have alleged non-compliance, which could have significant implications for the builder's operations and reputation.
An examination of the outcomes reveals that the builder lost these cases primarily due to insufficient evidence to support their claims. The verdicts of 'Delay condoned. No costs' suggest that while the builder may have faced delays, they could not convincingly demonstrate that these were beyond their control or comply with regulatory frameworks adequately. This highlights a pattern where the builder’s litigation was possibly triggered by a lack of transparency and effective communication regarding project timelines and compliance practices.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18)MA454-U-2.22inSC… | Maharashtra | Misc. application not objected, allowed. Delay co… | ["Delay condonation… | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | Anr. | WyaNen Vastucon LLP | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1eWd3GfNfzO6pRi90rOs-BFIlG1E5enAE |