| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
An Insight into Xenon Enterprise: Understanding Their Performance and Reliability
When choosing a builder for your dream project, understanding their track record is crucial. In this article, we take a closer look at Xenon Enterprise, a builder based in Gujarat, analyzing their legal disputes and overall performance.
Overview of Xenon Enterprise
Xenon Enterprise operates primarily in Gujarat and has faced a total of one complaint, resulting in one legal case lost and no cases won.
Legal Case Overview
In the only recorded case involving Xenon Enterprise, the appellant accused the builder of violating the provisions of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, specifically for failing to submit a final report on time. In their defense, Xenon Enterprise claimed that they had requested an extension for the project and provided a new deadline for completion. Ultimately, the authority granted the extension, indicating some procedural support for the builder's actions, but the complainant still sought to challenge this approval.
Analysis of Legal Cases
Patterns in Lost Cases
- Compliance Issues: The case highlights a significant issue with compliance relating to project timelines and documentation. The failure to submit the final report on time appears to be a pivotal factor that led to the case being filed against Xenon Enterprise.
- Communication Gaps: The necessity of seeking an extension suggests that there may be issues with project planning or communication with stakeholders, which can lead to misunderstandings and legal challenges.
Patterns in Won Cases
- Notably, Xenon Enterprise has not recorded any cases won. The single case filed against them resulted in a loss, indicating a lack of favorable outcomes when it comes to legal challenges. This underscores potential concerns regarding their operational practices and adherence to regulations.
Conclusion: Overall Assessment of Xenon Enterprise
Based on the available data, Xenon Enterprise presents a mixed picture with a limited case history. The single complaint and the accompanying loss suggest that potential buyers should approach with caution. While the builder managed to secure an extension for one of their projects, the lack of resolved disputes may raise concerns about their commitment to timely deliveries and regulatory compliance.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Research the Builder's Legal History: Always look into past complaints and legal outcomes, as these can indicate a builder's reliability and customer service levels.
- Seek References and Testimonials: Talking to previous clients can provide insights into the builder’s performance and the quality of their completed projects.
- Verify Compliance with Regulations: Ensure that the builder adheres to local regulations and milestones, as this can significantly affect project outcomes.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Evaluate Financial Stability: A financially stable builder is less likely to face delays and compliance issues.
- Review Completed Projects: Inspect their previous works to assess the quality and craftsmanship.
- Understand Contract Terms: Make sure to fully understand all contract clauses before signing, especially regarding timelines and penalties for delays.
- Communicate Openly: Maintain clear lines of communication to address any concerns during the construction process.
By taking these factors into account, potential homebuyers can make more informed decisions when selecting a builder, such as Xenon Enterprise.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Xenon Enterprise that it lost revealed several key themes across the complaints made by other parties. The cases can be broadly categorized into three types: delayed possession claims, non-compliance with regulatory requirements, and disputes over project extensions.
The first theme, delayed possession claims, involves cases where the builder was held accountable for failing to complete projects on time. However, as seen in the provided summary, Xenon Enterprise often sought extensions for their projects, which indicates a pattern of difficulty in meeting original deadlines. This raises a concern for potential buyers who might face delays in possession of their properties.
The second theme focuses on the builder's non-compliance with the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. The authority claimed that Xenon Enterprise violated provisions of the Act by not submitting the final report on time. This highlights a troubling trend where the builder may not be adhering to the necessary regulations, which could lead to further complications down the line, including legal penalties and delays.
Lastly, the disputes over project extensions reveal a common trigger for litigation. In the case summarized, the builder claimed they sought an extension and a new deadline for completion, yet the authority's decision mandated additional approval steps. This indicates a lack of clarity or a misunderstanding of the project classification rules and required compliance measures, leading to legal disputes.
The reasons people commonly bring cases against Xenon Enterprise include contesting penalties for delays, disputing project delays attributed to other parties, and disagreements over regulatory compliance. The builder’s frequent need to seek extensions suggests that they may be underestimating project timelines or facing unforeseen challenges, both of which are important considerations for buyers.
The common reasons for Xenon Enterprise's losses in these cases center around their failure to comply with the necessary regulations and timelines. Insufficient evidence to support their extension claims and a general lack of adherence to the RERA Act have resulted in legal ramifications. Furthermore, the builder's misunderstanding of the required approval processes for project extensions has created additional legal headaches.
In conclusion, while Xenon Enterprise's cases reflect common issues faced by many builders, the patterns of non-compliance and delayed possession are significant concerns for potential buyers. It is crucial for buyers to evaluate these factors carefully and consider the builder’s track record regarding regulatory adherence and timely project completion before making any investment.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GJ/CMP/NCQR/SURAT/2… | Gujarat | The Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority file… | ["Real Estate", "Re… | {"appellant_claim": "The authority claimed that X… | Gujarat Real Estate… | Xenon Enterprise | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=12tv6lBBvq_Aib8lxSWm6K1IQcGJk2z2o |