| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
In the bustling real estate market of Gujarat, buyers put their trust in builders to provide quality construction and transparent dealings. One such builder is Yamuna Enterprises. However, potential buyers may want to approach this particular builder with caution after analyzing the available data regarding complaints and legal cases involving the company.
Overview of Legal Cases
Yamuna Enterprises has been involved in two legal cases, both of which they lost. The primary issues highlighted in these complaints revolved around the lacking provision of registered sale deeds and visible defects in the properties such as damp walls, cracked tiles, and broken mosquito nets.
Summary of Complaints
In both cases filed against Yamuna Enterprises, the appellants argued that the builder failed to provide a registered sale deed and that their purchased flats had various defects. The builder's defense centered around the claim that the appellants were not entitled to a registered sale deed because they had failed to pay the total amount due under their agreement. Ultimately, the authority partly upheld the complaints and ordered Yamuna Enterprises to pay Rs. 3,30,000 and to execute the necessary registered sale deed.
Analysis of Legal Case Patterns
Patterns in Cases Lost
The common factors in the cases that Yamuna Enterprises has lost include:
- Failure to Provide Key Documentation: The most significant issue raised by the appellants was the lack of a registered sale deed, a crucial document in property transactions.
- Deficiency in Property Quality: Complaints highlighted serious defects in the properties, indicating either poor construction quality or inadequate maintenance by the builder.
Patterns in Cases Won
Interestingly, the data indicates that Yamuna Enterprises has not won any legal cases against them, signifying a persistent pattern of complaints leading to unfavorable outcomes for the builder.
Conclusion
Based on the provided data, Yamuna Enterprises presents red flags for potential buyers. With two lost cases highlighting serious deficiencies in documentation and property quality, the builder may not be the safest choice for individuals looking to invest in real estate in Gujarat.
Tips for Potential Buyers Considering Yamuna Enterprises
- Thoroughly Review Documentation: Ensure all paperwork, especially regarding the sale deed, is completed and provided before making any financial commitments.
- Conduct Independent Property Inspections: Hire a professional to inspect the property for any visible defects before finalizing your purchase.
- Verify Builder's Reputation: Research the builder's past projects and customer reviews to gauge their reliability.
General Tips for Buyers When Selecting Any Builder
- Check Legal History: Look into any legal disputes the builder may have faced and examine the outcomes.
- Investigate Financial Stability: Ensure that the builder has a solid financial standing to avoid project delays and incomplete work.
- Seek Recommendations: Talk to friends or family about their experiences with builders they have worked with.
- Understand Your Rights: Familiarize yourself with the local laws and your rights as a buyer to avoid exploitative situations.
By adhering to these guidelines and keeping an eye on builders like Yamuna Enterprises, potential buyers can better protect their investments and ensure a smoother property purchasing experience.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Yamuna Enterprises, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into the recurring themes surrounding their legal disputes.
The cases can be broadly categorized into two common themes: Registered Sale Deed Disputes and Defects in Construction. Each of these themes highlights essential issues that purchasers faced, leading to legal action against the builder.
In the Registered Sale Deed Disputes, the primary contention was the builder's failure to provide a registered sale deed to the buyers. The builder claimed that the purchasers were not entitled to a registered sale deed since they had not paid the full amount owed according to the agreement. However, the authority ruled in favor of the buyers, indicating a legal obligation on the builder's part to deliver registered sale deeds once the purchase agreements were executed, regardless of any remaining balance.
The Defects in Construction theme encompasses various flaws that buyers reported in their flats, such as dampness in walls, cracks in tiles, and broken mosquito nets. These defects suggest a lack of quality control during the construction process and a failure on the builder’s part to ensure that the units were delivered in a satisfactory condition.
A pattern emerges from these summaries: the common triggers for litigation involve either the builder’s failure to fulfill contractual obligations related to documentation or their inability to deliver properties that meet acceptable construction standards. People brought cases to court primarily because they felt cheated either financially (through being denied proper deeds) or otherwise (through subpar construction).
The builder lost these cases largely due to their failure to comply with legal requirements, particularly concerning the provision of registered sale deeds. The rulings indicated that buyers' payments and agreements dictate a builder's obligations, which include delivering timely and adequate documentation. Furthermore, the repeated instances of construction defects highlight a systemic issue within the builder's operations, which likely contributed to the legal outcomes.
Overall, these cases serve as a warning to potential buyers about the importance of thorough due diligence when engaging with builders. It is crucial to review contract terms, assess the builder's reputation, and inspect properties carefully before making any purchase decisions.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GJ/CMP/OFC/Rajkot/2… | Gujarat | The complainant, Mr. Karthikaraj Mansukhbhai Dham… | Registered Sale Dee… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellants claimed that … | Mr. Avanita Mansukh… | Yamuna Enterprises | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1BVvuiXzDZKJKIPqqXc0W9DfZ9S1ejoJz |