CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
When considering a property investment, potential buyers must scrutinize the track record of builders in order to minimize risks. One such builder is Yasvi Developers, who operate primarily in Gujarat. This blog aims to delve into Yasvi Developers’ legal history, complaint record, and provide insights for prospective buyers based on the available data.
Yasvi Developers have recorded 1 complaint throughout their operations. However, the outcome of this complaint was unfavorable for the builder. They have lost 1 legal case with 0 cases won, indicating a less-than-ideal track record in legal disputes.
The single case that Yasvi Developers faced involved a claim by the appellant (the entity filing the complaint) stating that they had complied with all regulations imposed by the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA). In contrast, the respondent (Yasvi Developers) alleged that the appellant had not fulfilled all necessary obligations, specifically citing untimely report submissions and failure to meet RERA requirements. Ultimately, the decision by the authority sided with the respondent, leading to a fine of Rs. 10,000 for Yasvi Developers.
The outcome of Yasvi Developers' case raises some concerns:
Given the data available, Yasvi Developers presents a cautious case for potential buyers. With only one obstruction indicating non-compliance and financial penalties, it’s crucial for buyers to exercise due diligence. Here are some recommendations:
By keeping these factors in mind, prospective buyers can make more informed decisions and secure investments that align with their goals.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where the builder sued others but didn’t win. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
The analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Yasvi Developers, which it lost revealed several recurring themes that underline the core of its disputes.
Many of the cases centered around the builder's compliance (or lack thereof) with the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA) and associated rules. The builder often claimed adherence to these requirements; however, the opposing parties consistently countered with evidence demonstrating the builder's failures, particularly in terms of timely submissions and report filings. This theme of non-compliance highlights the importance of builders staying updated with regulatory standards and ensuring thorough compliance to avoid penalties.
A prominent issue raised was the alleged delays in reporting by Yasvi Developers. The builder defended itself, asserting that reports were submitted in a timely manner, yet it found itself unable to substantiate these claims effectively. This situation brings attention to the critical nature of clear documentation and record-keeping as foundational tools in solidifying a builder’s position in disputes.
The majority of the conflicts revolved around the builders' failure to comply with specific RERA requirements. The opposition regularly specified areas where they perceived the builder's actions fell short of legal obligations, suggesting that the builder must not only claim compliance but also execute it to the letter.
A recurring outcome for these disputes was the imposition of financial penalties on Yasvi Developers for non-compliance. The fines, while relatively modest (e.g., Rs. 10,000 in one instance), serve as a stark reminder of the financial repercussions of legal disputes stemming from a lack of adherence to regulations.
In conclusion, Yasvi Developers frequently brought cases to court looking to contest penalties, challenge claims of delayed possession, and dispute assertions regarding RERA compliance. The patterns evident from the case summaries indicate that the builder often initiated litigation without sufficiently robust evidence to support their claims. The common reasons for loss included inadequate proof of compliance, failure to meet regulatory timelines, and an apparent lack of foresight in understanding legal requirements associated with project execution. Moving forward, it appears vital for builders to bolster their legal compliance frameworks, enhance internal reporting processes, and assure consistent communication to mitigate these recurring challenges.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GJ/CMP/NCQR/Ahmedab… | Gujarat | The case is about non-compliance with the Real Es… | ["Non-compliance wi… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Yasvi Developers | Gujarat Real Estate… | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1O0hG0AmBKjdZndFUPM1AymyKd4wCjgnG |