CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
When it comes to investing in real estate, potential buyers are often keen to understand the track record of the builders involved. Yati Bula Estate, operating primarily in Rajasthan, presents an intriguing case with its limited but notable history of legal disputes. This post aims to delve into the specifics surrounding Yati Bula Estate, including the nature of complaints filed against them and an analysis of their legal performance.
Yati Bula Estate has been subject to one formal complaint, which resulted in one loss and no wins in legal proceedings. Specifically, the sole case against them involved allegations concerning their status as the promoter of a project. The authority asserting the complaint claimed that Yati Bula Estate was not the legitimate promoter and had unlawfully used the emblem of the Shyamashish Group. In contrast, Yati Bula Estate defended itself by asserting it held no claim of being a promoter or an agent of the referenced project.
The final verdict concluded with the authority imposing a penalty on Yati Bula Estate and mandated a subsequent hearing, which indicates a reprimand regarding legitimacy issues.
In the solitary case lost by Yati Bula Estate, the common factor appears to revolve around misrepresentation of their role in relation to the project. The court found sufficient grounds to deem their actions questionable, suggesting a theme of insufficient transparency or misunderstanding about their promotional rights. The implications of such a ruling raise concerns about the integrity of their branding practices and how they present their involvement in property projects.
Interestingly, while Yati Bula Estate has one unresolved case they appear to have won in terms of claims being filed where they stated they are neither a promoter nor an agent, they did face penalties indicating that their actions were scrutinized. The lack of any significant win also paints a picture that buyers might want to be cautious about the builder's legal landscape.
Based on the provided data, Yati Bula Estate operates with a problematic reputation bolstered by a legal loss indicating issues of legitimacy and transparency. For potential buyers, this situation might require careful consideration. Engaging with a builder that has encountered legal penalties could suggest there are underlying issues that might jeopardize the quality of service or compliance with regulations.
In conclusion, while Yati Bula Estate presents opportunities in the Rajasthan real estate market, buyers should proceed with caution and diligence in light of the builder's legal history.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Yati Bula Estate, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into two main topics: disputes over project promotion and representation, and penalties for regulatory non-compliance.
The first type of dispute revolves around the builder's representation of the project. In one significant case, the authority claimed that Yati Bula Estate used the emblem of the Shyamashish Group without authorization, implying that they misrepresented their promotional role in the project. The builder's defense was rooted in their claim of not being the promoter or agent for the project, yet the implications of emblem usage suggest a lack of clarity in their promotional materials that could have misled potential buyers.
The second theme involves regulatory compliance and the penalties associated with non-conformity. In the aforementioned case, the authority imposed a penalty on Yati Bula Estate after determining that their actions warranted disciplinary action. This penalty highlights an emerging pattern where builders may face legal repercussions due to insufficient adherence to regulatory standards, especially concerning the proper use of emblems and branding which can directly affect project credibility.
Common reasons for litigation in these cases include contesting penalties imposed by regulatory authorities, disputes over the builder’s role in promoting projects, and the ramifications of non-compliance with legal requirements. Builders often find themselves in court due to a failure to understand or adhere to the nuances of regulatory compliance, particularly in how they present their projects to the public.
The consistent loss in these legal battles suggests that Yati Bula Estate has faced challenges related to providing adequate evidence of compliance or defending their promotional practices. The outcomes may also indicate a degree of misunderstanding about project classification rules and the appropriate use of branding, leading to a series of decisions that ultimately resulted in legal penalties.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F.१५ (२७१)RJRERA-20… | Rajasthan | The Rajasthan Real Estate Regulatory Authority is… | ["Unauthorised use … | {"appellant_claim": "The authority claimed that t… | Rajasthan Real Esta… | Yati Bula Estate | https://rera.rajasthan.gov.in/Content/pdf/2044F.15 (271)RJ-RERA-2023.pdf |