| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
When considering a builder for your next home, it is essential to weigh their track record, including any legal issues they may have encountered. Yellow Stone Landmark, a builder with a mixed reputation, has faced a few notable complaints that prospective buyers should be aware of.
Overview of Yellow Stone Landmark
Yellow Stone Landmark has recorded a total of 2 complaints against them, both of which have resulted in cases lost for the builder. There is currently no information on the states in which they have projects, making regional performance evaluation challenging.
Legal Case Details
The legal proceedings associated with Yellow Stone Landmark offer insights into the builder's operations:
- Case 1: The complaint was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh complaint.
- Case 2: In this case, the complainant alleged that the project was not registered with the relevant authority, leading to another dismissal, again allowing the complainant the opportunity to withdraw and refile.
These cases highlight a potential recurring issue: the failure to register projects properly, which can be a significant red flag for potential buyers.
Analysis of Legal Outcomes
Cases Lost
In both instances of losing a case, the common factor appeared to be the handling of project registrations. The fact that the second complainant specifically pointed out the lack of proper registration could suggest a systemic issue within the builder's operations. This raises concerns about compliance with local building regulations and could indicate a trend of negligence in administrative responsibilities.
Cases Won
Notably, Yellow Stone Landmark has not won any cases so far, which significantly impacts its overall reputation. The dismissals of complaints, while not indicating guilt, nonetheless reflect poorly on their ability to manage disputes effectively.
Conclusion: Assessing Yellow Stone Landmark
Considering the provided data, Yellow Stone Landmark presents some alarming signals for potential buyers, primarily stemming from their legal history. With no cases won and issues related to project registration, buyers should approach this builder with caution.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Research Thoroughly: Before making any decisions, investigate the builder’s reputation, focusing on complaints and legal outcomes.
- Verify Registrations: Ensure that any projects you are interested in are fully registered with the applicable authorities.
- Request References: Speak with previous customers to get insight into their experiences with the builder.
- Consult Legal Help: If you decide to proceed with Yellow Stone Landmark, consider consulting a legal professional to review contracts and agreements thoroughly.
General Tips for Selecting Any Builder
- Check for any existing complaints or legal actions against the builder.
- Review customer feedback and online ratings.
- Ensure transparency in communication and accountability from the builder.
- Verify licensing, insurance, and registration with local authorities.
By taking these steps, you can navigate the home-buying process more safely, ensuring that your investment is protected.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Yellow Stone Landmark, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the complaints raised by the other parties involved.
The cases can be broadly categorized into two main topics: Regulatory Compliance Claims and Project Registration Disputes.
Regulatory Compliance Claims encompass a range of issues, primarily concerning the builder's adherence to legal and regulatory standards. In these cases, complainants often cite failures such as non-registration of projects, which leads to disputes over the legitimacy of the projects themselves. The summary indicates that the complaint regarding the project not being registered with the authority highlights a significant area of concern for potential buyers who may be unaware of the implications of investing in unregistered projects.
Project Registration Disputes revolve around the specific requirements for projects to be duly registered with appropriate authorities. This topic overlaps with regulatory compliance, as project registration is a legal requirement for builders. The cases that were dismissed with liberty to file fresh complaints suggest that there may be ongoing issues related to project registration that were not resolved satisfactorily in the initial filings.
Common reasons for bringing cases to court include the aforementioned regulatory non-compliance and project registration issues. It appears that there is a pattern of disputes triggered by the builder’s failure to secure proper registrations and comply with regulatory frameworks, leading to heightened scrutiny from buyers and authorities alike.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to the complaints being dismissed with liberty to refile, indicating that the initial claims may not have been substantiated with sufficient evidence, or that the complainants are permitted to reapproach the issues with potentially stronger arguments. The dismissals suggest a degree of leniency in the legal proceedings, allowing complainants to revise their claims rather than outright denying them justice.
Overall, this analysis highlights the importance for buyers to investigate regulatory compliance and project registration status before making any investment in properties developed by Yellow Stone Landmark. It reveals a need for vigilance and due diligence in the real estate market to avoid potential pitfalls associated with non-compliant projects.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AO/RERA/18/2018 | Not provided | Complaint withdrawn by the complainant's represen… | Project registratio… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… | Saurabh Dhiman | Yellow Stone Landma… | https://rera.punjab.gov.in/rera/rwdataOrdersJudgementsByAO\2019\/AO_18_of_2018.pdf |
| AO/RERA/23/2018 | Not provided | Complaint withdrawn by the complainant with permi… | ["Withdrawn complai… | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | Pawan Kumar | Yellow Stone Landma… | https://rera.punjab.gov.in/rera/rwdataOrdersJudgementsByAO\2019\/AO_23_of_2018.pdf |