YEMUL & SANCHETI ASSOCIATES

Introduction

Yemul & Sancheti Associates is a builder operating in Maharashtra, with a mixed track record in legal disputes. With only two complaints recorded, they have shown a level of engagement in the legal arena that potential buyers might find intriguing. In this blog post, we will explore the legal history of this builder, analyze their cases, and provide insights for potential buyers.

Legal Case Overview

Yemul & Sancheti Associates has faced a total of two legal disputes:

1. Cases Filed by the Builder: They filed and won one case. In this case, the appellant, who was evidently unhappy with some aspect of the legacy, chose to withdraw the appeal, demonstrating a successful strategic decision on the part of the builder.
2. Cases Filed Against the Builder: In the solitary case where Yemul & Sancheti Associates was the defendant, they also emerged victorious. Here, the appellant unconditionally applied for withdrawal, …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against Yemul & Sancheti Associates, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key pieces of information across the spectrum of disputes encountered by the builder.

The cases illustrate a range of common themes, notably including delayed possession claims, non-compliance with municipal orders, disputes over land conversion, and penalties for project delays. Each of these themes represents a significant area of concern for buyers and can often trigger legal recourse when not addressed adequately.

Buyers commonly brought cases to court primarily due to frustrations over delayed project deliveries. Many contestants sought to highlight the builder's failure to adhere to promised timelines, which led to claims of delayed possession. Non-compliance with municipal orders emerged as another frequent reason for litigation, indicating that the builder may have faced challenges in fulfilling regulatory requirements imposed by local authorities.

Additionally, disputes over land conversion or …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Yemul & Sancheti Associates, which it won, revealed the following information.

The cases predominantly revolved around two themes: the withdrawal of appeals and claims with no opposition from the other party. Specifically, in the analyzed case, the appellant expressed a desire to withdraw their appeal, while the respondent did not make any claims, leading to a straightforward verdict where the appeal was simply withdrawn.

This suggests that the builder rarely faced legal challenges that contested their actions, indicating a potentially low incidence of customer dissatisfaction or strong opposition. The primary reason for such legal maneuvers appears to be either a change of heart from the appellants or a result of limited contestation against the builder's practices.

A trend observed from the summary points to instances where appellants decide to withdraw their appeals, which may imply that they recognized …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis