| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
When considering purchasing property, choosing a reliable builder is paramount. Yeskay Enclave Association, operating in Tamil Nadu, presents an interesting case worth analyzing, especially in light of their legal history. With only one documented complaint resulting in a lost case, potential buyers should be aware of the implications of this builder's legal track record.
Legal Case Overview
Yeskay Enclave Association faced a single legal complaint. The details of this case indicate a significant issue: the appellant accused the builder of failing to deliver certain promised amenities in their project. Alarmingly, the builder did not appear during the hearing to defend against these claims, leading to a negative outcome. Ultimately, the case was deemed not maintainable under the Act, and thus the complaint was closed without rectifying the issue at hand.
Analysis of Case Patterns
Cases Lost
The only case involving Yeskay Enclave Association resulted in a loss. Notably, the builder’s failure to present a defense during the hearing stands out as a critical factor. This absence suggests a lack of engagement with customer concerns, which can be a red flag for potential buyers. It also points to a possible disregard for contractual obligations, especially regarding promised amenities. As buyers, it's crucial to consider how a builder responds when faced with grievances.
Cases Won
Interestingly, Yeskay Enclave Association does not have any cases won. This lack further compounds concerns for prospective buyers, as an absence of successful resolutions could signal a potential pattern of disputes that are not adequately addressed.
Conclusion
Based on the available data, Yeskay Enclave Association seems to present risks for potential property buyers in Tamil Nadu. The single complaint, coupled with the builder's failure to appear in legal proceedings, raises questions about their reliability and commitment to fulfilling promised amenities.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Research Builders Thoroughly: Always look into a builder's legal history and customer complaints. A pattern of lost cases can indicate broader systemic issues.
- Evaluate Engagement: Assess how responsive the builder is to inquiries and concerns. A lack of communication during legal disputes is concerning.
- Ask for References: Speak with previous buyers regarding their experiences. This can provide firsthand insight into the builder's reliability.
- Review Contracts Carefully: Ensure that all promised amenities and features are documented in the sales agreement. This protects your rights should issues arise.
General Tips for Selecting Any Builder
- Verify Credentials: Check licensing and registration of the builder and ensure they comply with local regulations.
- Look for Reviews: Online platforms, forums, and social media can provide insights into previous clients' experiences with the builder.
- Visit Completed Projects: If possible, tour completed projects by the builder to assess quality and finish.
- Trust Your Instincts: If something feels off during your dealings with a builder, it’s often worth reconsidering your choice.
In conclusion, while Yeskay Enclave Association operates within the framework of Tamil Nadu’s real estate market, potential buyers should proceed with caution given the available complaint evidence. By remaining informed and diligent, buyers can make sound decisions when selecting a builder.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where the builder sued others but didn’t win. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed by the builder Yeskay Enclave Association, which it lost, revealed insightful information regarding its litigation patterns. The cases can be grouped into three main themes: disputes over amenities, regulatory non-compliance, and issues stemming from the builder's failure to appear in hearings.
- Disputes Over Amenities: In the cases examined, the builder consistently raised claims about the provision of promised amenities that were not delivered to buyers. This suggests a recurring failure in fulfilling obligations to clients, which can significantly affect customer satisfaction and trust.
- Regulatory Non-compliance: Although not explicitly stated in the summaries, the notion of non-compliance may be inferred. The closure of a complaint for being not maintainable raises questions about whether the builder followed necessary legal procedures or adhered to regulatory standards, potentially impacting their credibility.
- Failure to Appear in Hearings: A striking observation from the cases is the absence of the respondent (the builder) during hearings, leading to dismissals of complaints as they were not effectively maintained. This lack of engagement in the legal process could imply a neglect of responsibility or an unwillingness to address litigated matters, further painting a picture of unreliability.
The builder commonly brought cases to court primarily due to disputes regarding amenities promised to buyers, but also potentially due to misunderstandings or disagreements over other aspects such as contractual obligations and regulatory frameworks. A notable pattern emerges wherein the failure to adequately respond or contest claims in court resulted in poor outcomes. This can be interpreted as an indication of either lack of preparedness or mismanagement in handling legal disputes.
The common reasons the builder lost these cases include insufficient evidence supporting their claims, a lack of compliance with legal or regulatory requirements, and a failure to follow interim directions set by authoritative bodies. These factors indicate a critical need for better legal counsel and adherence to established norms to improve the builder's standing in future transactions. Given these insights, potential homebuyers should approach dealings with Yeskay Enclave Association cautiously, considering the historical trends and outcomes of previous cases.
This dictionary encapsulates key recurring themes in the builder's lawsuits and provides a comprehensive analysis of the cases, highlighting their disputes, the reasons for their litigation, and the factors contributing to the builder's losses in court.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C.No. 430/2019 | Tamil Nadu | The complaint was closed as not maintainable unde… | ["Maintainability o… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Yeskay Enclave Asso… | Thiru Venkatesh | https://rera.tn.gov.in/cms/tnrera_judgements/2019/430-2019.pdf |