No Logo Available

YESKAY ENCLAVE ASSOCIATION

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Tamil Nadu
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

When considering purchasing property, choosing a reliable builder is paramount. Yeskay Enclave Association, operating in Tamil Nadu, presents an interesting case worth analyzing, especially in light of their legal history. With only one documented complaint resulting in a lost case, potential buyers should be aware of the implications of this builder's legal track record.

Legal Case Overview

Yeskay Enclave Association faced a single legal complaint. The details of this case indicate a significant issue: the appellant accused the builder of failing to deliver certain promised amenities in their project. Alarmingly, the builder did not appear during the hearing to defend against these claims, leading to a negative outcome. Ultimately, the case was deemed not maintainable under the Act, and thus the complaint was closed without rectifying the issue at hand.

Analysis of Case Patterns

Cases Lost

The only case involving Yeskay Enclave Association resulted in a loss. Notably, the …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Disputes over Amenities Regulatory Non-compliance Failure to Appear in Hearings

Analysis of the cases filed by the builder Yeskay Enclave Association, which it lost, revealed insightful information regarding its litigation patterns. The cases can be grouped into three main themes: disputes over amenities, regulatory non-compliance, and issues stemming from the builder's failure to appear in hearings.

  1. Disputes Over Amenities: In the cases examined, the builder consistently raised claims about the provision of promised amenities that were not delivered to buyers. This suggests a recurring failure in fulfilling obligations to clients, which can significantly affect customer satisfaction and trust.
  2. Regulatory Non-compliance: Although not explicitly stated in the summaries, the notion of non-compliance may be inferred. The closure of a complaint for being not maintainable raises questions about whether the builder followed necessary legal procedures or adhered to regulatory standards, potentially impacting their credibility.
  3. Failure to Appear in Hearings: A striking observation from the cases is the absence …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review

Interested in buying from YESKAY ENCLAVE ASSOCIATION?

Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.