| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
In the competitive world of real estate, the credibility of builders plays a pivotal role in influencing buyer decisions. This post delves into the legal journey of builder Yogesh Kerkar, analyzing his track record through complaints, case outcomes, and the implications for potential buyers.
Builder Profile: Yogesh Kerkar
- Number of Complaints: 2
- Cases Won: 0
- Cases Lost: 2
- States with Projects: Maharashtra
Legal Case Insights
The legal history of Yogesh Kerkar reveals significant details about his standing in the real estate market. It is essential to analyze both the cases he has lost and the nature of the appeals that he has pursued to gain a comprehensive understanding of his performance.
Cases Lost
Yogesh Kerkar has lost a total of two cases. While specific details about these cases are not provided, the record indicates a consistent struggle in the legal arena, which raises concerns about his business practices or client satisfaction. The notable absence of victorious outcomes suggests that there may be ongoing challenges in formally addressing the complaints from clients.
Cases Won
Interestingly, Yogesh Kerkar has won two cases that revolve around the withdrawal of appeal. In these cases, the appellant intended to withdraw their appeal against the builder, and the respondent did not object to this withdrawal. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, leading to their disposal. While this may seem like a procedural victory, it does not reflect positively on his ability to address complaints effectively and successfully in court. Rather, these outcomes highlight his lack of engagement with the original settlement of disputes.
Analysis of Patterns
Upon examining the cases that Yogesh Kerkar has lost, it is apparent that there are significant patterns:
- Lack of Successful Resolutions: The builder has not won any cases, indicating a potential pattern of unresolved disputes.
- Distrust from Clients: The consistent losses could signify issues regarding trust and satisfaction from buyers who had to escalate matters legally.
On the other hand, the cases that he has won showcase a procedural nature devoid of substantive victories in terms of addressing client grievances. This brings into question whether his business practices align with client expectations and satisfaction.
Conclusion
The overall assessment of builder Yogesh Kerkar reveals a troubling profile for potential buyers. With two lost cases and a clean sweep of zero wins in substantive matters, prospective buyers may find it prudent to approach with caution. While the builder may have navigated procedural appeals favorably, this does not mitigate the concerns originating from the complaints filed against him.
Tips for Potential Buyers
If you are considering purchasing from Yogesh Kerkar or any builder with a similar profile, here are essential tips:
- Conduct Thorough Research: Investigate the builder's reputation in the market, read online reviews, and consult with previous clients.
- Ask About Legal History: Inquire about any ongoing or prior disputes and how they were resolved. A transparent builder will willingly provide this information.
- Seek Legal Advice: Consider consulting with a legal professional to help dissect the legal conditions of your potential purchase and serve as a guide through any red flags.
- Trust Your Instincts: If something feels off during your interactions with the builder, consider exploring other options.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
Regardless of the builder you are considering, keep these tips in mind:
- Verify Credentials: Ensure the builder is licensed and has a good standing with local real estate boards.
- Review Past Projects: Look at completed projects to gauge the quality of work and adherence to timelines.
- Inspect Contracts Carefully: Review all documentation concerning your purchase, and ensure all obligations are clearly laid out.
In conclusion, the journey with real estate is a significant commitment; thus, thorough homework and caution are vital for ensuring a successful and satisfactory investment.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against builder Yogesh Kerkar, which he lost, reveals several key points across the board. The cases highlight a few common themes, notably revolving around the builder's attempts to withdraw appeals and the respondents' reactions to these actions.
The first identified theme is the "Withdrawal of Appeals." In multiple instances, the builder sought to withdraw his appeals, indicating a potential change in strategy or a realization that the ongoing litigation might not be worthwhile. This could stem from various reasons, such as new negotiations with the other party, a re-evaluation of the legal landscape, or simply a decision to cut losses.
The second theme is the "Objections to Appeals," or rather the lack thereof. In each case summarized, the respondent expressed no objection to the builder's withdrawal of the appeal. This suggests a level of disengagement or indifference from the other parties involved, which could imply that the builder's actions were not causing significant harm or that the respondents were satisfied with the status quo.
Lastly, there's the theme of "Miscellaneous Applications," which were pending in conjunction with the appeals. The verdicts disposing of these applications indicate that there were other legal avenues being explored, possibly concerning project details, regulatory compliance, or financial disputes. However, the specifics of these applications remain vague in the summaries provided.
A pattern emerges where the builder's litigation often ends in withdrawal rather than a conclusive verdict, signaling potential issues with the builder's legal approach or the validity of the claims made. The common triggers for these litigations appear to revolve around the builder's operational decisions and the reactions from other parties, which raises questions about the builder's adherence to agreed-upon terms and conditions.
The reasons for the builder's losses in these cases are not explicitly stated in the summaries, but one can infer that they might be related to insufficient evidence to support the claims made, or perhaps a lack of compliance with regulatory requirements. The frequent withdrawal of appeals suggests a strategic shortfall rather than a legal one, indicating that the builder may have entered into litigations without robust grounds or adequate preparation. Overall, this underscores the importance for potential clients to carefully evaluate a builder's legal history and operational integrity before making any commitments.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT006000000083887 | Maharashtra | Appellant sought to withdraw the appeal, which wa… | ["Withdrawal of App… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant sought to with… | Rajyog Enterprises | Yogesh Kerkar | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1g0tRed1oi-7ArtSRKtAdMjRdXVIxnxtS |