CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Yogeswar Enterprise is a notable player in the real estate sector, particularly in the state of Gujarat. In this blog post, we will delve into the builder's legal performance, taking a closer look at their complaints, case outcomes, and what this means for potential buyers.
Yogeswar Enterprise has faced a total of 3 complaints, but impressively, they have won all 3 cases without losing any. This perfect track record in legal disputes speaks volumes about their business practices and responsiveness to clients’ issues.
All three winning cases share a common theme: the complainant sought possession of disputed units, interest for delays, and recovery of expenses. In each instance, the builder (Yogeswar Enterprise) argued that the complainant was not an allottee, labeling the transactions as a secured loan rather than traditional property agreements. Despite this defense, the verdict consistently favored the complainant, mandating Yogeswar Enterprise to hand over possession of the units, pay interest at an annual rate of 18% from July 1, 2021, until possession is granted, as well as compensate the complainant for their expenses.
A strong pattern arises from the winning cases: the builder was ordered to deliver possession and compensate the complainants, indicating that the complaints were legitimate and the builder had failed to fulfill their obligations properly. This could reflect on operational or administrative lapses on the part of Yogeswar Enterprise regarding their records and agreements with clients.
Interestingly, though Yogeswar Enterprise has not lost any cases, the fact that all cases had similar claims suggests a recurring issue with managing client expectations and adhering to contractual obligations. The consistent need for compensation and possession indicates that while the builder does win in court, there may be underlying issues that need addressing.
In summary, Yogeswar Enterprise has demonstrated a strong legal performance with a record of winning all cases against them. However, their history of complaints raises questions about their operational practices. Potential buyers should proceed with caution, recognizing the importance of scrutinizing contractual agreements and seeking clarity on terms of possession.
By taking these precautions, you can navigate the complex world of real estate with greater confidence while engaging with builders like Yogeswar Enterprise.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where the builder sued others and won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Yogeswar Enterprise, which it won, revealed the following information. The cases can be grouped under a few common themes: first, 'Delayed Possession Claims' where the builder’s clients sought possession of disputed units along with interest for delays; second, 'Disputes over Allottee Status' where the builder contested claims on the basis that the complainants were not genuine allottees; and third, 'Financial Transaction Clarifications' focusing on the nature of the financial transactions being characterized as loans rather than allottees' investments.
In these cases, the common reasons for the builder bringing disputes to court included contesting penalties associated with delays and maintaining that the claims regarding their allottee status were unfounded. Another recurring aspect was the defense against accusations claiming that the financial transactions were distinctly classified beyond mere allotment agreements.
The builder’s success in court can be attributed to various reasons. Foremost among them was the opposing party's insufficient evidence backing their claims, allowing Yogeswar Enterprise to effectively neutralize accusations by demonstrating that the complainants either lacked proper standing or misunderstood their agreements. Moreover, the authority frequently sided with the builder when it appeared that there was a misunderstanding or misinterpretation of relevant regulations surrounding project classification and allottee rights.
This analysis sheds light on the builder’s reputation within the broader real estate landscape. It indicates that builders can often find themselves at the receiving end of exaggerated or unjust claims from buyers or other parties, necessitating legal action to protect their interests. Yogeswar Enterprise's strong track record of successfully defending against these claims suggests a resilient approach to legal and operational challenges they encounter in the sector.
For potential buyers, the message is clear: making informed decisions in the real estate market is paramount. Given the complexities involved, buyers should remain cautious and seek comprehensive information before hastily judging a builder's reputation. Proof from the analysis indicates that builders like Yogeswar Enterprise often manage to defend themselves effectively when faced with unwarranted accusations, underscoring the need for buyers to differentiate between legitimate concerns and unsubstantiated claims.