CIN | U45400DL2015PTC283971 |
---|---|
Year Established | 11 August 2015 |
Address | A-27, MCIE, Mathura Road , New Delhi, Delhi, India - 110017 |
Company Status | Private |
Zack Estates Private Limited is a builder with operations primarily in Haryana. This article provides an in-depth look at the builder’s legal track record, highlighting complaints, case outcomes, and offering valuable insights for potential buyers.
Zack Estates has recorded a total of 1 complaint, which reflects a relatively low level of dissatisfaction among its customers. Importantly, the builder has won all cases it was involved in, demonstrating a successful record in legal disputes.
Overall, Zack Estates Private Limited has managed to navigate legal challenges effectively, maintaining a win rate of 100%. While the builder has one complaint on record, their ability to win legal disputes reflects a robust operational framework. This may suggest reliability in fulfilling obligations, particularly regarding possession timelines, although they did face an issue which resulted in legal proceedings.
By following these guidelines, prospective buyers can navigate the complexities of the real estate market and make informed decisions about purchasing properties from Zack Estates Private Limited or any other builders.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where the builder sued others and won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Zack Estates Private Limited, which it won, revealed the following information. These cases primarily revolve around the theme of delayed possession claims, where buyers have sought damages for not receiving property possession on time. However, a significant number of these disputes are often linked to the failure of the buyers to clear outstanding dues, which becomes a key argument in the builder's defense.
One common type of case involved buyers filing for charges related to delayed possession, while the builder contended that the buyers were not entitled to such claims due to unpaid balances on their accounts. In these disputes, the builder has consistently highlighted its compliance with regulations surrounding possession orders once the legal and financial requirements were met.
The reasons leading the builder to court usually stem from contesting penalties imposed by buyers for project delays, which are often attributed to outstanding payments or other conditions that must be satisfied prior to progress. Such patterns indicate that misunderstandings regarding payment timelines and possession clauses are prevalent, prompting the builder to defend its interests in legal forums.
Zack Estates Private Limited has won these cases due to several factors. Primarily, the opposing parties frequently lack sufficient evidence to support their claims, especially regarding payments made or the technicalities of the contractual obligations. In several instances, buyers misinterpret legal stipulations surrounding property possession and their respective responsibilities, which plays directly into the builder's defense strategy. Moreover, when buyers fail to comply with prior agreements or court directions, the builder has been able to leverage this non-compliance to its advantage.
This analysis sheds light on the builder’s reputation within the broader real estate market. While accusations may arise, they are not always founded in fact, revealing instances where builders like Zack Estates Private Limited stand firm against exaggerated or ungrounded claims. Thus, the builder demonstrates a robust capability not only to deliver projects but also to navigate the complexities of legal disputes that can emerge from misunderstandings or financial discrepancies with buyers.
In conclusion, potential buyers are advised to tread carefully when assessing claims against builders. While there are valid concerns within the real estate sector, it’s crucial to take a holistic view of cases. The success of Zack Estates Private Limited in defending itself against numerous allegations suggests that buyers should invest time in understanding the nature of disputes before forming impressions about a builder's trustworthiness.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3039, 3040, 3043, 3… | Haryana | The complainant sought delay possession charges f… | Delay in possession… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant sought delay… | Zack Estate | Emaar India Limited | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/OTE1NjA= |