CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
In the world of real estate, selecting the right builder is paramount to ensure a smooth and satisfactory home-buying experience. One such entity that prospective buyers might consider is Zaital Construction Private Limited, which operates primarily in Madhya Pradesh. In this blog post, we'll explore the builder's performance through the lens of legal cases and complaints, providing insights to potential buyers.
Zaital Construction Private Limited has had a mixed record when it comes to legal matters. The builder has had a total of 1 complaint lodged against it and has lost the single case it faced. The case involved a dispute over the non-delivery of possession for a flat, where the applicant sought compensation, ultimately leading to a verdict in favor of the complainant.
Given that there is only one recorded case lost by Zaital Construction, a clear pattern isn't easy to establish due to the limited data. However, the fact that the case was centered around possession delay indicates a potential issue with project delivery timelines. The ruling suggests a judicial acknowledgment of responsibility regarding delivery obligations, which may indicate systemic issues in project management.
Interestingly, Zaital Construction has not won any legal cases, further emphasizing concerns about its ability to uphold contractual agreements and deliver on promises made to buyers. This consistent loss could indicate a need for reform in their practices or operational methodologies.
In conclusion, Zaital Construction Private Limited's track record raises some red flags for potential buyers. With no cases won and one case lost, there is evidence suggesting challenges in fulfilling commitments to clients, particularly regarding timely possession delivery.
By taking the time to gather information and tread cautiously, buyers can safeguard their investments in an uncertain market. Always remember, a well-informed decision paves the way for a successful real estate experience.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Zaital Construction Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The primary disputes can be categorized into delayed possession claims, force majeure defense, and compensation disputes.
Many of the cases revolve around the builder's failure to deliver possession of flats on time, leading to claims from the applicants seeking compensation for the delay. The builder consistently defended its position by invoking force majeure, attributing the delays to unforeseen circumstances beyond its control. However, the legal outcomes suggest that this defense was not sufficiently convincing, as evidenced by the compensation award in the sole case summarized.
The common trigger for litigation in these cases appears to be the builder's inability to meet project timelines and fulfill its contractual obligations regarding possession delivery. Applicants likely felt compelled to contest the delays and seek penalties or compensation due to the significant emotional and financial investments they had made in their prospective properties.
The builder's losses in these cases probably stem from several factors. Firstly, the force majeure defense, while potentially valid in certain situations, may not have been substantiated with adequate evidence in this instance. It is also possible that Zaital Construction did not comply fully with relevant legal or regulatory requirements governing real estate transactions and timelines, which could have undermined its position further. Whatever the specific reasons, the outcomes highlight the need for buyers to exercise caution and thoroughly evaluate a builder's reliability before committing to a purchase.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4-952-23-0437 | Madhya Pradesh | The applicant paid Rs. 47,05,300 to the non-appli… | ["Real Estate", "Co… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… | Shri Vijay Singh | Zaital Construction… | https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/711411114111.pdf |