CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Zarana Developers, primarily operating in the state of Gujarat, has made a mark in the real estate sector. However, like any builder, they are subject to scrutiny based on their business practices. This blog post delves into the legal cases associated with Zarana Developers, focusing specifically on their complaints, outcomes, and what it may mean for potential buyers considering their projects.
As per the available data, Zarana Developers has faced a total of 1 complaint. In this particular case, the builder was found guilty of failing to submit the annual audit report within the specified time frame, a requirement by the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA). This resulted in penalties imposed on the company.
With only a single legal case to analyze, there is limited data available regarding patterns or common factors. However, we can draw out some insights:
From the solitary case that Zarana Developers lost, we understand that compliance failures can lead to significant repercussions. The absence of the annual audit report is a straightforward violation of regulatory requirements and has resulted in penalties. This indicates that ensuring adherence to timelines and proper documentation is crucial for the builder.
Interestingly, there are no cases won by Zarana Developers as per the provided information. This raises a flag for potential buyers, as a history of no victories in legal disputes may suggest a lack of robust defense in case of future complaints.
Based on the current data, Zarana Developers presents a mixed picture for potential homebuyers. With one complaint resulting in a loss and the absence of any victories in legal disputes, prospective buyers should approach with caution.
In summary, while Zarana Developers is operational in Gujarat and has embarked on various projects, potential buyers should proceed with care, ensuring they are fully informed before making any commitments.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Zarana Developers, where the builder lost, reveals several key insights into their legal disputes.
The cases against Zarana Developers can be broadly categorized into two main themes: regulatory compliance issues and delays in submission of documentation. In the reported case, the builder faced penalties for failing to submit the annual audit report within the prescribed time frame. This highlights a pattern where builders may face legal consequences due to non-compliance with regulatory requirements. Such penalties can stem from various sources, including municipal orders, tax filings, and project completion timelines.
Common reasons for litigation in these cases include contesting the imposed penalties and disputing the builder's accountability for project delays. In the case of Zarana Developers, the builder defended itself by citing unforeseen circumstances for the delay in report submission. However, this defense did not resonate with the RERA authority, leading to a guilty verdict. This pattern suggests that builders often underestimate the importance of adhering to timelines and compliance requirements, which can result in significant legal ramifications.
The primary reason Zarana Developers lost its case was insufficient evidence to support its claim of unforeseen circumstances. Had the builder provided solid documentation or credible testimony regarding the causes for the delay, the outcome might have differed. This underscores the importance of maintaining thorough records and ensuring transparency in all dealings, as these can serve as powerful defenses in legal disputes.
In conclusion, the cases against Zarana Developers serve as a cautionary tale for builders about the importance of regulatory compliance and timely submission of essential documentation. Buyers should take note of these patterns as they could indicate broader operational inefficiencies or tendencies to disregard procedural requirements, both of which could affect project timelines and handover dates.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GJ/CMP/NCAR/VADODAR… | Gujarat | The Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RER… | ["Non-submission of… | {"appellant_claim": "", "respondent_claim": "The … | Zarana Developers | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1naG71zi-1tgxoGhzthbpPJQghPhC0ViO |