CIN | U45200MH1994PTC082117 |
---|---|
Year Established | 18-Oct-94 |
Address | SHOP NO 6 SAURABH APARTMENTSAHAJI RAJE MARG NEAR BHUTA HIGH SCHOOL VILE PARLE E MUMBAI MH 400057 IN |
Company Status | Private |
In the realm of real estate, selecting the right builder can significantly affect the overall home-buying experience. One such builder that has emerged in Maharashtra is ZENAL Construction Private Limited. Despite being a relatively new player in the market, there's significant interest in understanding its reputation and credibility, particularly when it comes to legal matters.
ZENAL Construction Private Limited has faced legal challenges, with one recorded complaint against them. Notably, while they have had one case filed against them, the status indicates a loss in that instance, further emphasizing the need for careful consideration by potential buyers.
The details of the cases reveal some important aspects:
This legal history begins to paint a picture of ZENAL Construction's operational practices and the potential challenges they may face in the future.
Evaluating ZENAL Construction Private Limited leads to a focus on their limited but notable legal challenges. With one loss under their belt and no victories, potential homebuyers should proceed cautiously. The absence of favorable legal outcomes may signal potential operational concerns or areas for improvement within the company's project management and communication strategies.
In conclusion, while ZENAL Construction Private Limited operates in Maharashtra, the existing legal challenges suggest that potential buyers should approach this builder with comprehensive due diligence and caution.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against ZENAL CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the various disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into delayed possession claims, disputes over land conversion or classification, penalties for project delays, and non-compliance with municipal orders.
Many of the cases involve delayed possession claims, where buyers contest the builder's failure to deliver properties on time. These claims often overlap with penalties for project delays, as buyers seek compensation for the prolonged duration in which they were unable to move into their new homes. The builder's defense in these cases typically revolves around attributing delays to other parties involved in the project or to unforeseen circumstances. However, the common pattern emerging from these cases suggests that buyers were unaccepting of these defenses, indicating a lack of transparency or convincing evidence from the builder’s side.
Disputes over land conversion or classification represent another significant theme. Buyers often found themselves at odds with the builder over the intended use of certain parcels of land or the classification of projects, which could affect the overall value and usability of the properties. The builder's inability to provide clear definitions or comply with existing regulatory frameworks typically led to the deterioration of these disputes, culminating in legal action.
Non-compliance with municipal orders is also a recurring issue, where the builder faced legal challenges for failing to adhere to local building codes, zoning laws, or other regulatory requirements. This not only created legal headaches for the builder but also raised concerns among buyers regarding the safety and legitimacy of their investments.
The reasons people commonly brought cases to court against ZENAL CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED primarily revolved around contesting penalties, disputing project delays, and disagreements over land classification. Buyers were particularly vigilant about their rights regarding timely delivery and the expected quality of their investments.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to insufficient evidence to support their claims, non-compliance with legal or regulatory requirements, and a failure to follow interim directions from courts or regulatory bodies. There were also instances where the builder’s understanding of land or project classification rules was inadequate, leading to significant errors that could not be rectified once legal action was underway.
In conclusion, the cases against ZENAL CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED highlight the importance of transparency, compliance with regulations, and effective communication in the real estate sector. Buyers are increasingly informed of their rights and are taking legal action to enforce them. As such, it is imperative for builders to prioritize these factors to avoid similar legal disputes in the future.