CIN | U70100KA2012PTC067409 |
---|---|
Year Established | 27-Dec-12 |
Address | NO.50/8A, 2ND FLOOR,GUBBI CROSS, HENNUR BAGALUR MAIN ROAD, KOTHNUR BANGALORE Bangalore KA 560077 IN |
Company Status | Private |
Zoe India Properties Private Limited, operating predominantly in Karnataka, has recently garnered attention due to complaints filed against the firm. While they have not lost any cases, understanding the landscape of the complaints can offer valuable insights for potential buyers considering this builder.
Zoe India Properties has a total of 3 complaints logged against it, all of which have concluded with a victory for the builder. This suggests that the firm has managed to defend itself effectively against claims made by dissatisfied clients. However, reviewing the details of these complaints reveals some crucial patterns.
Though Zoe India Properties has not lost any cases, the complaints filed against them provide a narrative worth analyzing:
From the details of the complaints, a few patterns emerge:
Zoe India Properties has successfully won all cases filed against them, indicating that:
Based on the available data, Zoe India Properties Private Limited demonstrates a strong legal performance with no cases lost. However, potential buyers should approach with caution. They may want to ensure that all contractual obligations and regulatory approvals are clearly outlined and understood prior to making any commitments.
In summary, while Zoe India Properties has successfully handled its legal challenges thus far, prospective buyers should ensure they have all information at their disposal before making significant investment decisions.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, but the builder won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Zoe India Properties Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The disputes can be categorized into several key themes: claims of payment without transaction evidence, project completion and allottee status, and non-registration of plots due to approval issues.
In the first category, a common theme emerged where complainants claimed to have made payments for plots but lacked any evidence of a transaction with the builder. This indicates a potential pattern where buyers may have misunderstood their dealings or were presenting exaggerated claims.
The second theme revolved around project delays and the status of allotments. Complaints filed often sought relief due to alleged delays in project timelines. However, evidence in these cases showed that complainants were sometimes not actual allottees but rather investors filing multiple claims against the builder.
The final theme highlighted disputes over the registration of plots. Complainants claimed non-registration despite having made payments; however, the builder defended these claims by stating the absence of necessary approvals, which ultimately led to the dismissal of such complaints.
The reasons for filing these cases often stemmed from buyer dissatisfaction, misunderstandings regarding project status, or regulatory complications. A recurring pattern from the summaries reflects how buyers sometimes make claims without adequate proof, leading to court disputes.
Conversely, the common reasons for the builder's success in these cases include a lack of evidence from the opposing parties, issues of non-compliance with legal requirements, and the inability of complainants to substantiate their claims of payments or project delays. The builder's apt defense against what appears to be sometimes exaggerated accusations indicates their proactive approach in ensuring compliance with regulatory norms and transparency in transactions.
This analysis shines a light on the builder's reputation in the real estate market. It indicates that while some buyers may have valid concerns, there are instances where accusations can be unfounded or misinterpreted. Zoe India Properties Private Limited has demonstrated a strong track record of defending against these allegations, suggesting that buyers should remain cautious and well-informed.
In conclusion, potential buyers should recognize the importance of informed decision-making in real estate transactions. This analysis illustrates that, while disputes in the market are inevitable, builders like Zoe India Properties Private Limited can often successfully defend themselves against unjust claims. It's essential for buyers to approach claims carefully, verify information, and seek clarity before forming an opinion about a builder’s reputation.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMP/UR/220119/00088 | Karnataka | The complainant alleged that the respondent had n… | ["Unregistered plot… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant alleged that… | Zoe India Propertie… | https://rera.karnataka.gov.in/reraDocument?DOC=3770161 | |
CMP/UR/210622/0008 | Karnataka | The complainant sought relief for registration of… | ["Real estate proje… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… | The complainant | Zoe India Propertie… | https://rera.karnataka.gov.in/reraDocument?DOC=3770174 |
CMP/UR/210210/00051 | Karnataka | Complainant sought refund of Rs. 2,00,000 for plo… | ["Refund for plot",… | {"appellant_claim": "Complainant claimed she gave… | Zoe India Propertie… | https://rera.karnataka.gov.in/reraDocument?DOC=3770170 |