CIN | U51909DL2005PTC134126 |
---|---|
Year Established | 17 March 2005 |
Address | 275, PICCADILY HOUSE FLOOR1 CAPTAIN GAUR MARG, SRINIVASPURI , New Delhi, Delhi, India - 110065 |
Company Status | Private |
When it comes to investing in real estate, potential buyers seek reliable builders with a solid track record. Zuku Exports Private Limited stands out as a noteworthy company based in Haryana, currently with a minimal history of complaints. In this blog post, we will dissect the builder's performance based on the data available, analyzing both their victories and setbacks in legal cases.
Zuku Exports Private Limited has encountered only one complaint throughout its operations, which resulted in a favorable outcome for the builder as they won the case. This suggests a responsive approach to customer grievances, but it's crucial to delve deeper into the details of their legal challenges to gain a comprehensive understanding of their reliability.
Zuku Exports Private Limited presents itself as a viable option for potential homebuyers in Haryana, with a robust legal resolution mechanism that reflects positively on their operational integrity. Despite having faced a complaint, their ability to resolve it favorably indicates a commitment to customer satisfaction and legal compliance.
In summary, Zuku Exports Private Limited appears to be a promising choice for homebuyers in Haryana, armed with a single complaint that they navigated efficiently. As with any major investment, thorough research and due diligence are key to ensuring a satisfactory home-buying experience.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, but the builder won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Zuku Exports Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed several recurring themes that provide insight into the nature of the disputes and the builder's defense strategies. The primary topics of contention include claims related to delayed possession, non-compliance with municipal orders, disputes over land conversion or classification, and penalties for project delays.
The cases often stemmed from opposing parties contesting penalties or expressing dissatisfaction with perceived delays in project timelines. There were instances where regulatory bodies raised issues regarding compliance, and disagreements over the classification of land emerged as another theme. Buyers and other parties appeared to file complaints not only due to substantial grievances but also possibly motivated by misunderstandings of the legal and regulatory framework surrounding real estate.
In examining the reasons why Zuku Exports Private Limited prevailed in these legal challenges, it becomes clear that a significant factor was the inability of the opposing parties to provide sufficient evidence to substantiate their claims. Furthermore, instances of non-compliance with legal or regulatory requirements on the part of the complainants played a role in favoring the builder. The builder's effective defense demonstrates a robust understanding of the legal aspects involved in real estate operations, which allowed them to counter what were sometimes baseless accusations.
The implications of this analysis suggest that while conflicts in the real estate market are not uncommon, buyers should remain vigilant. The cases indicate that builders can be wrongfully accused, leading to unnecessary legal battles. Zuku Exports Private Limited's successful track record in defending against such claims highlights a resilience that might contrast sharply with the accusations they faced.
For potential buyers, this analysis underscores the importance of conducting thorough research and seeking reliable information before forming opinions regarding a builder's credibility. While justified grievances do arise in the real estate sector, this review indicates that builders like Zuku Exports Private Limited can effectively defend against claims that are exaggerated or unfounded. As such, informed decision-making is paramount for navigating the complexities of real estate transactions.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1984 of 2019 | Haryana | The respondent deposited the deficit registration… | ["Registration fee"] | {"appellant_claim": "", "respondent_claim": "", "… | Zuku Exports Privat… | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/Mjc3OTA= |